07/ 10
Freedom of expression Not even the right to life is absolute in Brazil's Constitution
Brazil's Constitution protects freedom of expression. But no right is unlimited: not life, not freedom of movement. Saying whatever you want has rules too, and they are written in the law.
What the law guarantees
The Constitution protects speech
Brazil's 1988 Constitution says that "the expression of thought is free, anonymity being forbidden"[1]. In other words: everyone can speak, but must own what they say.
In the same article, it guarantees the right of reply and compensation for moral damage[1]. And it says that people's honor and image are inviolable[1]. Whoever speaks answers for what they say.
Other rights
Every right has a limit
Life. The Constitution bans the death penalty, "except in case of declared war"[1].
Freedom of movement. Movement is free "in time of peace"[1]. And a person can be arrested when caught in the act or by a judge's order[1].
Property. It is guaranteed, but "property shall fulfill its social function"[1]. The law allows expropriation, with compensation[1].
Assembly. Everyone may assemble "peacefully, without weapons"[1]. Phone privacy can also be lifted by court order, in a criminal investigation[1].
Rights live side by side. When one runs into another, the law and the courts say where the line is.
Where speech stops
Racism is not an opinion
The Constitution says that "the practice of racism is a crime not subject to bail or to a statute of limitations"[1]. Not subject to a statute of limitations means the crime never expires.
In 2003, Brazil's Supreme Court (STF) upheld, by 7 votes to 3, publisher Siegfried Ellwanger's conviction for racism. He published books against Jews[2]. Justice Gilmar Mendes wrote in his vote that "freedom of expression cannot be given primacy"[2].
In practice
The Monark case
In February 2022, host Bruno Aiub, known as Monark, said on Flow Podcast: "I think the Nazi should have the Nazi party, recognized by law"[3].
The next day, Flow took the episode down, dismissed Monark and apologized "to the Jewish community in particular and to everyone"[3]. The Prosecutor General's Office (PGR) opened a proceeding to look into a possible defense of Nazism[4].
Monark was not convicted for the remark. In March 2026, the São Paulo Public Prosecutor's Office asked the court to reject the R$ 4 million civil action against him[5]. The report mentions no court ruling[5].
In a separate case, about false news, the STF fined Monark R$ 300,000 in July 2023. The reason was disobeying a court order[6]. The order barred him from posting news deemed fraudulent and anti-democratic[6].
The case shows the rule in practice: speech is free, but it has consequences, and whoever feels harmed can go to court.
The debate
Absolute freedom of expression
In 2023, then Justice Minister Flávio Dino called the idea "of freedom of expression as an absolute value" "a fraud"[7]. Jair Bolsonaro replied that the remark "attacks freedom of expression"[7].
But the Constitution itself sets limits. Treating speech as a right without limits contradicts the very text that protects it.
Pass this page on
An image with the main fact, in story format, and the link to this page.
Referências07 sources
- 01Câmara dos Deputados (Legislação) · Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988, art. 5ºArt. 5, items IV, V, X, XII, XV, XVI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XLII, XLVII "a" and LXI.(opens in a new tab)
- 02STF Notícias · STF nega Habeas Corpus a editor de livros condenado por racismo contra judeusHC 82,424: Siegfried Ellwanger's conviction for racism upheld 7 to 3; Gilmar Mendes's vote.(opens in a new tab)
- 03SBT News · Flow Podcast desliga Monark após apologia ao nazismoMonark's remark in episode 545, his dismissal and Flow's apology.(opens in a new tab)
- 04Congresso em Foco · PGR abre investigação contra Kim e Monark por declarações sobre nazismoAugusto Aras ordered a proceeding to look into a possible defense of Nazism.(opens in a new tab)
- 05SBT News · MP recua e pede arquivamento de ação contra Monark por fala sobre nazismoOn 03/31/2026 the São Paulo Public Prosecutor's Office (MP-SP) asked for the R$ 4 million civil action to be dismissed; no court ruling reported.(opens in a new tab)
- 06SBT News · Moraes arquiva inquérito contra influenciador MonarkR$ 300,000 fine on 07/28/2023 for disobeying a court order on fraudulent and anti-democratic news.(opens in a new tab)
- 07Gazeta do Povo · Bolsonaro condena falas de Dino sobre fim da liberdade de expressão como valor absolutoFlávio Dino's remark and Jair Bolsonaro's reply on X.(opens in a new tab)
Source titles are in the language they were published in.